Southern Shore Lines

Nose Stuffed Up? Try Seawater - April 2008
     A team of medical scientists tested out a series of nasal flushes on children between the ages of six and ten, including one that was sterilized Atlantic Ocean seawater.  A three times a day washout produced significantly reduced cold symptoms, far better than did the common over-the-counter nostrums. “It makes sense to clean the cavities where the microbes that might worsen the infection are present. That’s what the seawater does, and it’s the minerals and trace elements in the seawater that help restore the mucus lining of the nose” said a co-author of the study. 
     If you decide to use natural seawater rather than a synthetic mixture, first boil it, then run it through a coffee filter.

Legal Note - October 2007
   “Dolphin safe” tuna means those tuna not caught by purse seine. Yellowfin tuna often congregate below pods of dolphin who are inadvertently enmeshed as the seine is drawn closed.The public took “dolphin safe ” to heart forcing some commercial fishermen out of business.  Commercial groups asked for a relaxation of the regulations.  NOAA asked the National Marine Fisheries Service to restudy the issue.  Based on one study,  NMFS said purse seining had no effect on dolphin populations.

   The Ninth Court has just ruled the study was inconclusive and therefore their conclusions were “arbitrary and capricious ”. Thus far, the original meaning of “dolphin safe” still stands.  

Nitrogen Pollution in Estuaries - October 2007

  On July 31,2007, NOAA released a report on nutrient pollution in estuaries. Among other findings, it shows a clear connection between what goes on upstream and the health of the receiving estuary. The report predicts “conditions in 65 percent of the nation’s estuaries are likely to worsen in the next decade” while “only 20 percent will improve ”.  They also commented that aggressive management can reverse the trend citing the Tampa Bay estuary.  The Bay’s water has improved “due to regulations that have significantly reduced nutrient loading, thereby clearing the water and allowing seagrasses to rebound.

Red Snapper Rebuild - July 2007
   After years of oversight by a do-nothing Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, the Council under mandate by new federal regulations, has set rules for both red snapper and shrimp catches.  The new rules are being villified by all -- recreational and commercial fishermen, shrimpers, and, to a lesser extent, environmentalists, which means the new rules may do some good.
   For the recreational fisherman, the daily limit has fallen from four to two.  This had already been temporarily put into effect.  They must also use circle hooks and carry equipment to successfully return excess catch back into the water alive (an example of that is a hollow needle to deflate an enlarged swim bladder).  Commercial red snapper fishermen have had their yearly total cut from 9 million to 5 million pounds per year.
   Shrimpers, who affect red snapper population by inadvertently catching juveniles in their shrimp trawls, must cut their by-catch by 74 percent from their 2002-3 levels.
   The shrimp industry is presently in bad shape from a combination of rising fuel prices, lower catches per trawl and foreign competition.  In some ports, more than a third of the shrimp boats have quit fishing.

Red Snapper and Shrimp - January 2007
    New federal regulations with respect to shrimping beyond the three-mile limit will go into effect at the end of March 2007. There will be a ten-year moratorium on any new shrimp boats in the EEZ.  Only those who were shrimping in or before 2003 or who have a long history of Gulf shrimping will be issued permits. Red snapper catches will also be reduced.The NMFS recently set new rules reducing the total catch by 2.7 million pounds.  Restrictions will be placed both on recreational and commercial fishermen.  Recreational fishermen will be limited to two fish a day, down from four.  Both recreational and commercial fishermen blame shrimpers, who catch juvenile snapper as by-catch, for high snapper mortality. The toll may be as high as 80%of the juveniles each year. Shrimpers challenge that amount. Recent changes in shrimping should reduce by-catch by 50%.

Louisiana Wetlands - Soil depletion in the coastal wetlands of Louisiana has cre- ated a multitude of restoration plans including river diversions and channels to steer Mississippi river soil-laden water into those marshlands. However,a study recently published on wetlands sedimentation by hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005 shows they deposited considerable loads themselves.  Over 131 million metric tons accumulated on the coast and another 281 million tons was brought close to shore. This is 227 times the amount introduced by river diversion and almost 6 times the amount deposited by overbank flooding.  The authors conclude "the amount of sediment deposited from an average category 3 or larger hurricane is 1.7 times the amount potentially available through unconfined riverbank flooding, 4.6 times more than through crevasses in unconfined channels, and 72 times more than from river diversion".

  —Science 314, pp449-52

 

Fish Farming - Fish and Agriculture Organization, United Nations -October 2006 
     An almost exponential growth in fish farming has sent total world yields soaring while the catches of wild fish continue to decline.  At present, wild harvests yearly amount to twenty pounds per person and farmed fish, fifteen pounds.  The total per capita amount has probably peaked because wild catches are headed down and farmed fish are unlikely to keep up their current rate of expansion.  The reason is the heavy use of fishmeal from wild catches is used to feed farmed fish and that amount has remained steady at six to eight million tons a year since 1985. 
     In 2004, fifty million tons of farmed fish were marketed for human food as was sixty-six million tons of wild catch.  Another thirty-eight and a half million tons of wild fish were transformed into meal and oil.  Aquaculture in China and the far east accounts for most of the rapid growth of farmed fish.

                                                            

Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Act - July 2006
     By the time you read this, a greatly modified rework of the present act should be out of the Senate.  It isn't everything environmentalists wanted but environmentalists, commercial fishermen, and recreational fishermen all say they can live with it.

The Fox in the Henhouse - Cape Cod Chronicle - June 2006
     The old saying about letting the fox guard the chickens is often applied to commercial fishermen who dominate the councils that set catch limits. What the old saying does not address are the few smart foxes who limit their take so that food is always available.
     The Cape Cod Commercial Hook Fisherman’s Association, realizing that the current “days at sea’ approach to regulating cod catches on the Georges Bank was not working, got a 20 percent allocation of the total allowable catch on the Banks from NMFS then self-determined when, whom and how much for each member within their own organization.
     “Scientists set the quota and we manage it locally” said the executive director of the Association. Basically, the Association has  a contract with NMFS and the fishermen have a contract among themselves. They have been able to streamline reporting, reduce paperwork and cut the bad blood among their members. The Feds are impressed by their management style and hope it will be emulated in other fisheries. How well it all works still depends on how promptly over fishing ends and stocks rebuild.

Sustainability - April 2006
If ever there was a word with a murkiness of meaning, "sustainability" is it. If you look it up in Webster's Dictionary, you won't find it listed. "Sustainable" is about as close as you will come. As it is commonly used, you could say it is the capacity to keep an idea, a thing, a condition, a situation or whatever in balance over an extended period of time.  You will often see it applied to both environmental issues and to the economy. With the latter, it usually appears with a corollary word-growth. In either instance, the implied goal of sustainability is the long-term well-being of humans.

Unfortunately, as to its environmental usage, we really don't know at what point we have exceeded a sustainable state. The evidence suggests we have long passed that point in a number of places. The real world is a moving target. Change, fast or slow, is inevitable whether we choose to accept it or not. Each new generation takes the world in which it finds itself as the norm and over generations the world is strained more and more by our ever increasing numbers and over consumption. Nature's resiliency has been stretched beyond its capacity to bounce back and in too many places on earth we face permanent degradation as far as human use is concerned.

If we mean to sustain what we have right now, we imply acceptance of current degradation with the vague promise that it will go no further. The tragic flaw in that concept is we really don't know the full extent of the damage that has been done and
what that damage portends for the future. Undoing past damage and preventing more demands a paradigm shift that, at present, has not gained wide acceptance by those who have the power to affect change.

As for sustainable growth, that phrase is an oxymoron. We must decide when enough is enough. The current paradigm is there is never enough. Economic growth must go onward and upward without end. The consumption of goods and services has become the aim of a good life. Given finite resources and a growing population, the pursuit of "more" cannot continue indefinitely. That caveat, even in the face of a mountain of evidence, is rarely heeded when planning for the future, either singly or collectively. We have to rearrange our rules, laws, economic interests and ethical guides to both repair environmental degradation and change our appetites to what we can do without long-term harm to ourselves or some time down the road we will face sustainability at a much lower level of well-being than we have now..
                            -- Dave Bulloch
 

Safe Seafood? - January 2005
    As we exhaust the supply of wild fish in the oceans, aquaculture is growing rapidly, both here and abroad. We presently import nearly two billion pounds of shrimp, salmon and tilapia each year (2003).
    The Food and Drug Administration does little monitoring on imports. The Center for Food Safety in its recent publication “The Catch with Seafood” warns that these products often contain unacceptable levels of anti-biotics, dyes, hormones, anti-fungals, pesticides and a host of other suspect chemicals. Fish are also genetically engineered. Transgenes can trigger allergic reactions in humans among other effects.
    For a full account of these potential hazards write Center for Food Safety at 660 Pennsylvania Ave. Suite 302, Washington DC, 20003 and request a copy.

Invasion of the Sea Squirts - January 2005
    Sea squirts, tunicates to the biologist, are rarely recognized by the casual tidepool walker but in New England one species has become widely known. From abroad, this invader is swamping out everything in tide pools and elsewhere. With no natural enemies it is proliferating from Connecticut to Maine. It is also offshore, presently covering 40 square miles of bottom on Georges Bank. Smothering everything including shellfish, USGS scientist David Blackwood
commented “Nothing really wants to eat it, nothing grows on it, and nothing seems to prevent it from spreading.”
    The squirt in question is Didemnum. It forms dense mats that have the consistency of scrambled eggs. It will also encrust anything
in its way.
    There are nine indigenous species of sea squirts off Cape Cod but none have the characteristics of the invader. Other than using techniques to avoid inadvertent spreading, no one has yet the foggiest notion on how to reverse the present trend.
— Oceanus 44#1 p.28

New Robotic Sub - January 2005
    Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute is constructing a sub designed to go to the deepest waters of the ocean including the Challenger Deep at 11,000 meters. It should be ready for business by 2007.
    It can either travel independently or go by directions from a mother ship via a very thin fiber optic cable. The cable is not a tether and should it break the sub can find its way back on its own. The cable simply supplies and receives information. Tethers make ROVs difficult to maneuver and when parted, goodbye ROV. Currently, ROVs are not used in icy water for fear they will be lost if the tether severs. The new sub can photograph, send back video images, collect samples, make measurements and can be operated from any reasonably sized ship at a cost of $10,000 a day, about a third of what current ROVs cost to operate.
—Nature 437 p.612-3

Dissolving Away - January 2005
    A great number of marine organisms, from tiny forams to massive corals, extract calcium carbonate from seawater to build their skeletal structures. Surface ocean water is saturated with calcium carbonate at all latitudes. As human activity raises the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere more and more of it dissolves in seawater. This raises the water’s acidity and reduces the level of carbonate saturation.
    If the rising trend of carbon dioxide continues, a number of marine organisms will find it more and more difficult to to build and maintain their calcified structures. Orr and others have shown that at carbon dioxide levels predicted by 2050, some cold water critters face shell dissolution. Originally, scientists thought this process might not occur for hundreds of years but Orr finds that at high latitudes it may occur within decades.
— Nature 437, pp.681-6

Oceanus Returns - January 2005
    The magazine of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute is again being published. You can check it out as well as the magazine’s web site at www.oceanusmag.whoi.edu
. It’s a bit thinner than past issues but seems to be sticking to its past format that involves a particular theme. This issue covered tsunamis, the recent Asian one, the detection system and the possibility of one created in the Caribbean.

Nature in the News - October 2005
    The devastation wrought by hurricane Katrina has, by far, become the center of attention nationwide.  A couple of weeks before the storm hit, you couldn’t have interested more than a handful of elected federal officials in the steady demise of the natural defenses along the Gulf coastline.  Now,  those past losses are making their way into restoration plans, like stopping the loss of soil that now occurs by channeling the Mississippi River and stopping the continual harvesting of cypress swamps for mulch.  Over-built coastal zones are another matter.  Retreating from the sea isn’t easy for the feds to mandate but they (FEMA) and private insurers can dump the entire risk on the owners by refusing to insure them. 
     New Orleans isn’t the only major city at risk.  If hurricane Charley had hit the Tampa Bay estuary instead of Charlotte Harbor much of Pinellas County would have been under water as well as downtown Tampa, 8 to 14 feet according to one estimate.
-- Dave Bulloch

Eye of the Storm - October 2005
    In September 2004, the center of hurricane Ivan passed over six wave-tide gauges deployed by the Naval Research Laboratory.  The gages were in 200 and 300 feet of water just at the edge of the continental shelf of the Gulf of Mexico off the Louisiana coast.  At that point Ivan was a category 4 hurricane.
    Average wave heights ranged between 50 and 60 feet with occasional highs of 90 feet.  The researchers who conducted the analysis think the wave heights were even higher close to the eye wall's right-hand quadrant.  They also think the wave heights were attenuated by shoaling.  Nevertheless, the wave heights exceeded current model predictions based on the pressure in the center of the storm.
- Science 309, p.896
 

04/07/08 16:31